|
Amatlán Zapotec (Zapoteco de Amatlán) is spoken in San Cristóbal Amatlán and San Francisco Logueche, two municipalities in the district of Miahuatlán in the southern mountains of Oaxaca, Mexico.
|
|
These towns are situated at 5,590 and 6,110 feet above sea level, respectively. They lie at the foot of a very tall mountain which in Zapotec is called Yiroos. Traditionally, the people consider certain areas near the top of the mountain to be sacred.
|
San Cristóbal Amatlán (SCA), which was founded in 1715, has a population of 4,236, according to the census taken by INEGI in 2000. One of their main holidays is the town's patron saint on April 23-25 which is celebrated with a mass, parade, sporting events and a bull run. Other important days are the Guelaguetza, a Oaxacan fiesta celebrated July 23-25, and All Saints Day on November 1. The people of San Cristóbal mainly cultivate corn, beans, wheat and squash. The women weave palm mats and baskets, among other things. Many people go yearly to the coffee plantations in the southern mountains towards Pochutla to pick coffee. There is schooling available in the area at the kindergarten, primary, secondary, and high school levels. All the people native to the area speak Zapotec, and many are bilingual in Spanish. |
|
|
|
|
San Francisco Logueche (SFL) was founded in 1744, and according to the census taken in 2000, there are 1,868 inhabitants. They celebrate the town's saint day on October 4. They also have preschool, primary, and secondary schools. |
|
Even though the people of these towns understand each other, there are differences in the ways they speak. Some
words differ from one town to the other. For example: in San Cristóbal (SCA) they say
tub “one” and in San Francisco (SFL) they say tib; in SCA they say
nis “water”, but
in SFL they say nits; in SCA they say
kazet me ler “she is washing clothes”, in SFL they say kazat me
lar. The way in which the negative on the verb is formed is another difference. In SCA the negative is
formed by combining na+verb+t; in SFL they combine verb+da.
For example: in SCA they say
nakint na “I don't need”, but
in SFL they say kinda na; in SCA they say
namkeet na “I didn't hit”, but in SCA they say mkeda na.
Nonetheless, in SFL they can use both forms, which eases the difficulty those in either town have in
understanding those from the other town.
© 2009 Instituto Lingüístico de Verano, A.C.
Derechos reservados.
Puede reproducirse para fines no lucrativos
siempre y cuando no se altere en forma alguna.
All rights reserved.
May be reproduced for nonprofit use
so long as it is not modified in any way.