Kriang Stative/non-Dynamic Clauses and Standard Negation

What are the syntactic structures that Kriang (Austroasiatic, Katuic, S. Laos) uses for non-dynamic clauses? Kriang’s dynamic clauses follow an SV/AVP (SVO) pattern typical of SE Asia, i.e. Agent (Subject) Verb Patient (Object) (Tehan 2017). Kriang follows the most typical Austroasiatic word orders for these types of clauses Jenny, Weber & Weymuth (2015, pp. 57-59). The structures of the non-verbal (i.e. non-dynamic, stative, somewhat atypical) clauses described in this paper are as follows. The Kriang attributive clause has the structure Subject Attributive-Predicate [S Attrib]; no copula is used. The Kriang equative, locative and existential clauses each use different copulas, kəːt ‘be’, ʔăt ‘be.at’ and wi̤ː ‘exist’ respectively. Existential clauses and possessive clauses use the same copula (or verb) kəːt. Only one negator has been identified so far. Event clauses can be negated with the particle ɲĕ̤ʔ ‘not’ resulting in the structures Intransitive-Subject Negative Verb [S NEG V] and Transitive-Subject Negative Verb Object [A NEG V P]. An attributive clause places the negator ɲĕ̤ʔ ‘not’ immediately before the predicate. The equative clause places the negator immediately before the copula. Negative existential and possessive clauses use a different verb than their positive counterparts.